ROLE EXTENSION TO FILM REPORTING: HOW COMPLIANT ARE RADIOGRAPHERS IN THE SOUTH EASTERN NIGERIA?
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Role extension in radiography, particularly participation in image interpretation and film reporting, has been adopted in several healthcare systems to improve service delivery and address workforce shortages. In Nigeria, radiographers increasingly undertake extended roles, yet the level of compliance with film reporting practices and the contexts in which these roles are performed remain insufficiently documented.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the extent of radiographers’ involvement in X-ray film reporting as part of role extension and to assess patterns of compliance among practicing radiographers in South-Eastern Nigeria.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was employed. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire distributed electronically to practicing radiographers who met predefined inclusion criteria. The questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics, training in image interpretation, involvement in film reporting, practice setting, and perceptions of role extension. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), and results were summarized using descriptive statistics.
Results: Findings revealed that a proportion of radiographers were actively involved in X-ray film reporting, with higher participation observed in private healthcare facilities compared to public institutions. Involvement was more common among radiographers who had received formal or informal training in image interpretation. However, variability in compliance with structured reporting practices and institutional support was identified.
Conclusion: Radiographers in South-Eastern Nigeria demonstrate growing involvement in film reporting as part of role extension, particularly in private practice. Structured training, professional recognition, and policy support are recommended to strengthen compliance and ensure safe, standardized implementation of extended reporting roles.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles in JRRS are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to Cite
References
1. Anderson C, Heron K, Buxton AJ, Simpson E, Brecht J. A review of formal and informal radiographers’ reporting / opinion. Radiographer: The official journal of the Australian Institute of Radiography. 2006;53(1):29-33.
2. Beardmore C. Preliminary Clinical Evaluation and Clinical Reporting by Radiographers: Policy and practice Guidance. Society of Radiographers; 2013 [cited 2024 Apr 10]. Available from: http://www.sor.org/learning/document-library/preliminary-clinical-evaluation-and-clinical-reporting-radiographers-policy-and-practice-guidance
3. Brealey S, Scally A, Hahn S, Thomas N, Godfrey C, Coomarasamy A. Accuracy of radiographer’s plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta- analysis. Clinical Radiology. 2005;60(2):232-41.
4. Buskov L, Abild A, Christensen A, Holm O, Hansen C, Christensen H. Radiographers and trainee radiologists reporting accident radiographs: a comparative plain film-reading performance study. Clinical Radiology. 2013;68(1):55-8.
5. College of Radiographers. Role development revisited, the research evidence. London: College of Radiographers; 2003.
6. Ekpo EU, Egbe NO, Akpan BE. Radiographers’ performance in chest X-ray interpretation: the Nigerian experience. The British Journal of Radiology. 2015;88(1051):20150023.
7. Gqweta N. Role extension: The need, perceptions and experiences of South African radiographers in primary health care. The South African Radiographer. 2007;45(2):35-8.
8. Hardy M, Hutton J, Snaith B. Is a radiographer-led immediate reporting service for emergency department referrals cost effective? Radiography. 2013;19(1):23-7.
9. Judson EE, Nightingale JM. An evaluation of radiographer performed and interpreted barium swallows and meals. Clinical Radiology. 2009;64(8):807-14.
10. Kawooya M. Role extension for the radiographers in the new millennium [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2024 Apr 10]. Available from: http://www.isrrt.org/
11. Labiran A, Mafe M, Onajole B, Lambo E. Health workforce country profile for Nigeria. Africa Health Workforces Observatory. 2008:1-28.
12. McDonald RJ, Schwartz KM, Eckel LJ, Diehn FE, Hunt CH, Bartholmai BJ, et al. The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload. Academic Radiology. 2015;22(9):1191-8.
13. Monu JU, Hewlett V, Ostlere S. International Skeletal Society outreach in Sub-Saharan West Africa. Skeletal Radiology. 2011;40(3):251-4.
14. Okeji MC, Udoh BE, Onwuzu SW. Appraisal of reporting of trauma images: implications for evolving red dot system in Nigeria. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology. 2012;2(7):533-7.
15. Paterson A. Preliminary clinical evaluation and clinical reporting by radiographers: policy and practice guidance. Society of Radiographers; 2013.
16. Piper K, Cox S, Paterson A, Thomas N, Jeyagopal N, Woznitza N. Chest reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme. Radiography. 2014;20(2):94-9.
17. Piper K, Paterson A, Ryan C. The implementation of radiographic reporting services for trauma examinations of the skeletal system in 4 NHS trusts. NHS Executive South Thames funded research project. 1999.
18. Price KJ, Le Masurier SB. Longitudinal changes in extended roles in radiography: A new perspective. Radiography. 2007;13(4):265-70.
19. Price RC, Miller LR, Mellor F. Longitudinal changes in extended roles in radiography. Radiography. 2002;8(4):223-34.
20. Snaith B, Milner RC, Harris MA. Beyond image interpretation: Capturing the impact of radiographer advance practice through activity diaries. Radiography. 2016;22(4): e233-e238.
21. Swinburn K. Pattern recognition for radiographers. The Lancet. 1971;297(7701):589-90.
22. The Audit Commission. Improving your image-how to manage radiology services more efficiently. London: HMSO; 1995.
23. The College of Radiographers. Reporting by Radiographers: a Vision paper. London: The College of Radiographers; 1997.
24. The College of Radiographers. Medical Imaging Interpretation and Clinical Reporting by Non-Radiologists: The Role of the Radiographer. London: The College of Radiographers; 2006.
25. The Department of Medical Radiography and Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria. Curriculum for Bachelor of Science in Medical Radiography. Enugu: University of Nigeria; 2017.
26. The Radiographers Registration Board of Nigeria. Code of professional conduct and ethics for radiographers. Abuja: RRBN; 2004.
27. The Royal College of Radiologists. Diagnostic radiology: our patients are still waiting. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2016 [cited 2017 Apr 10]. Available from: http://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/diagnostic_radiology_our_patients_are_still_waiting_report_feb2016.pdf
28. The Royal College of Radiologists. Medical imaging interpretation by radiographers: Guidance for radiologists and healthcare providers. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2010.
29. Department of Health. Improving outcomes: A Strategy for Cancer. London: HMSO; 2011.
30. Woznitza N. Radiographer reporting. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 2014;61(2):66-8.
31. White P, McKay JC. The Specialist Radiographer- does the role justify the title? Radiography. 2004;10(3):217-27.