ASSESSMENT OF ULTRASOUND EQUIPMENT AS A POSSIBLE SOURCE OF NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Nosocomial infections have become an increasingly recognized problem in health facilities and ultrasound equipment can be one of the sources for the spread of these infections. This research is aimed at assessing the role of ultrasound equipment as a possible source of nosocomial infections in radiodiagnostics centers in Anambra state and to identify the type of micro-organism found on the equipment.
Method: This research involved swabbing of ultrasound probes (transabdominal and transvaginal probes), ultrasound couches and ultrasound gel, of five radiodiagnostic centres in Anambra state. A total of thirty-six swab samples were collected aseptically from the surfaces of ultrasound equipment before and after scanning and were taken to the laboratory for culture to isolate any pathogens.
Results: The results from this study demonstrated that a number of organisms were found on the ultrasound probes, couches and ultrasound gel. Organisms isolated include aerobic spore formers, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, coliform and a host of other bacteria.
Conclusion: Ultrasound equipment is a possible source of nosocomial infection. Although a wide spectrum of micro-organisms are found, the most common micro-organisms found on the ultrasound equipment in this region include: S. aureus, S. epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles in JRRS are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to Cite
References
Ekpo, E. U., Hoban, A., & McEntee, M. F. (2014). Optimisation of direct digital chest radiography using copper filtration. Radiography, 20, 346–350.
Almen, A. (1996). Examination technique, image quality and patient dose in paediatric radiology. Acta Radiologica, 37(3 Pt. 1), 337–342.
Pantell, B. J. (1993). Radiography in the neonatal intensive care unit: Dose reduction and image quality. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 44, 615–635.
Hall, L., & Palmer, M. (1993). Atlas of normal roentgen variants that may simulate disease. Seminars in Roentgenology, 8, 267–269.
Andersen, P. (2003). Dose reduction in radiography of the spine in scoliosis. Acta Radiologica, 23, 253–258.
Cook, J. V. (1998). Guidelines on best practice in the X-ray imaging of children. London: Queen Mary’s Hospital for Children. New England Journal of Medicine, 36, 84–91.
Hilton, W. (1993). Practical paediatric radiology (p. 380). Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
Edward, K. (1994). Practical parenting: How your fears and phobias affect your child (pp. 223–230). New York, NY: Goodyear Publishers.
Chronis, M. (2005). Relative dose efficiencies of anti-scatter grids and air gaps in paediatric radiography. Medical Physics, 11, 508–512.