RADIOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF NORMAL RANGE VALUES OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT SPACE IN NIGERIAN POPULATION

Main Article Content

Everistus Obinna Abonyi
Julius Amechi Agbo
Sobechukwu Warric I. Onwuzu
Benedict Uloma Nwogu Ugwoke
Emmanuel Arinze
Stephen Olisa Ugwu

Abstract

Background: Acromioclavicular joint space is one of the most common injuries of the shoulder region. Accurate diagnosis of most acromioclavicular (AC) joint pathologies depends on the knowledge of the normal range values of acromioclavicular joint space.
The variation in the normal AC joint spaces among the studied population points to the need to have population-specific reference range values of acromioclavicular joint space while the paucity of data on normal acromioclavicular joint space diameter in our
locality necessitated this study.


Objective: This study was, therefore, aimed at radiographically determining the normal reference range values of acromioclavicular joint space diameter with age in adult Nigerian and also to find its variation with sex.


Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in three tertiary hospitals in Enugu from January 2019 to July 2019. It involved digital anteroposterior shoulder radiographs of 628 adults (18 – 80 years) obtained using Zanca’s view and reported as normal by four consultant radiologists. The acromioclavicular joint space diameter is calculated as an integral of the distances between the superior and inferior borders of the acromioclavicular joint space. Data were analyzed using a linear regression model, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and independent sample t-test.


Results: The mean AC joint space diameter ranged from 3.63 mm at ≤ 20 years to 1.14 mm at 76-80 years of age. Acromioclavicular joint space diameter correlated strongly but negatively with age with correlation coefficients of -0.785, -.839, -.797, and -.780.
There was a significant difference between the acromioclavicular joint space diameter of males and females (p = 0.000).


Conclusion: This study has generated a reference range value of normal acromioclavicular joint space diameter with age in our locality while there is a difference in acromioclavicular joint space between male and female adult Nigerians.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Abonyi, E. O., Agbo, J. A., Onwuzu, S. W. I., Ugwoke, B. U. N., Arinze, E., & Ugwu, S. O. (2022). RADIOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF NORMAL RANGE VALUES OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT SPACE IN NIGERIAN POPULATION. Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences, 36(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.82547/jrrs/2022/ZJKF4109

References

1. Stucken C, Cohen SB. Management of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Orthopedic Clinics. 2015;46(1):57-66.

2. Dyrna FG, Imhoff FB, Voss A, Braun S, Obopilwe E, Apostolakos JM, Morikawa D, Comer B, Imhoff AB, Mazzocca AD, Beitzel K. The integrity of the acromioclavicular capsule ensures physiological centering of the acromioclavicular joint under rotational loading. The American journal of sports medicine. 2018;46(6):1432-40.

3. Shaffer BS. Painful conditions of the acromioclavicular joint. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1999;

7 (3): 176-88.

4. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J. Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. The American journal of sports medicine. 2007;35(2):316-29.

5. Haber DB, Spang RC, Sanchez G, Sanchez A, Ferrari MB, Provencher MT. Revision acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction: use of pre-contoured button and 2 allografts. Arthroscopy techniques. 2017; 6(6): e2283-8.

6. Mall NA, Foley E, Chalmers PN, Cole BJ, Romeo AA, Bach Jr BR. The degenerative joint disease of the acromioclavicular joint: a review. The American journal of sports medicine. 2013;41(11):2684-92.

7. DEPALMA AF. 20 The Role of the Disks of the Sternoclavicular and the Acromioclavicular Joints. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 1959; 13:222-33.

8. Ernberg LA, Potter HG. Radiographic evaluation of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints. Clinics in sports medicine. 2003; 22(2): 255-75.

9. Krill MK, Rosas S, Kwon K, Dakkak A, Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F. A concise evidencebased physical examination for the diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint pathology: a systematic review. The Physician and sports medicine. 2018; 46(1):98-104.

10. Saccomanno MF, De Ieso C, Milano G. Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics, and evaluation. Joints. 2014; 2(02):87- 92.

11. Petersson CJ, Redlund-Johnell I. Radiographic joint space in normal acromioclavicular joints. Acta Orthopedic. 1983;54(3):431–3

12. Flores, D.V., Goes, P.K., Gómez, C.M., Umpire, D.F. and Pathria, M.N. Imaging of the acromioclavicular joint: Anatomy, function, pathologic features, and treatment. Radiographics 2020; 40(5):1355-1382

13. Gastaud, O., Raynier, J.L., Duparc, F., Baverel, L., Andrieu, K., Tarissi, N. and Barth, J. Reliability of radiographic measurements for acromioclavicular joint separations. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2015; 101(8): S291-S295

14. Li X, Cusano A, Eichinger JK. Dislocations of the upper Extremity: Diagnosis and Management. Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2016; 163-182

15. Adelowo OO, Ogunton S, Ojo O. Shoulder pain syndrome among Nigerians. East African medical journal. 2009; 86(4).

16. Pope DP, Croft PR, Pritchard CM, Silman AJ. Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition. Annals of rheumatic diseases. 1997 May 1;56(5):308-12.

17. Brox JI. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: Shoulder pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003; 17:33-56.

18. Lehtinen JT, Kaarela K, Belt EA, Kauppi MJ, Skyttä E, Kuusela PP, et al. Radiographic joint space in rheumatoid elbow joints. A 15-year prospective follow-up study in 74 patients. Rheumatology. 2001;40(10):1141–5

19. Petersson CJ, Redlund-Johnell I. Radiographic joint space in normal acromioclavicular joints. Acta Orthopedic. 1983;54(3):431–3

20. Lee, S.Y., Kwon, S.S., Chung, C.Y., Lee, K.M. and Park, M.S., 2014. What role do plain radiographs have in assessing the skeletally immature acromioclavicular joint? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 472(1), pp.284-293.

21. Zumstein, M.A., Schiessl, P., Ambuehl, B., Bolliger, L., Weihs, J., Maurer, M.H., Moor, B.K., Schaer, M. and Raniga, S., 2018. New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 26(1),125-135.

22. Gastaud, O., Raynier, J.L., Duparc, F., Baverel, L.,Andrieu, K., Tarissi, N. and Barth, J., 2015. Reliability of radiographic measurements for acromioclavicular joint separations. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 101(8), S291-S295

23. Zanca, P. Shoulder pain: involvement of the acromioclavicular joint (analysis of 1,000 cases). American. Journal of Roentgenology. 1971; 112: 493-506.

24. Guillotin, C., Koch, G., Metais, P., Gallinet, D., Godeneche, A., Labattut, L., Collin, P., Bonnevialle, N., Barth, J., Garret, J. and Clavert, P., 2020. Is conventional radiography still relevant for evaluating the acromioclavicular joint? Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 106(8), pp. S213- S216.

25. Stecco, A., Sgambati, E., Brizzi, E., Capaccioli, L., Carli, G. and Bindi, A., 1997. Morphometric analysis of the acromioclavicular joint. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology= Archivio Italiano di Anatomia ed Embriologia, 102(3), pp.195-200

Most read articles by the same author(s)