AN ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY OF RADIOGRAPHS IN A NIGERIAN TEACHING HOSPITAL BY FILM DENSITOMETRY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: 3000 radiographs covering chest, upper limb, lower limb, lumbar spine (AP) and skull (PA) from the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH) were retrospectively studied by densitometry to assess the degree of variation in radiographic contrast over a ten year period (1999 – 2008).
Results: The results show that variation in mean radiographic contrast from year to year was statistically insignificant (p < 0.05) for the respective projections studied. This result implies a relatively basic standardisation in image quality arising from consistency in technique acquired over time.
Conclusion: The results would serve as a baseline for developing a more robust quality assurance programme in the hospital.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles in JRRS are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to Cite
References
Jenkins, D. (1981). Radiographic Photography and Imaging process. 2nd Edition. England: MTP Press, 302p.
Chesney, D.N. and Chesney, M.O. (1981). Radiographic Imaging. 4th Edition. London: Blackwell Scientific Publication, 530p.
Martin CJ, Sharp PF and Sutton DG. Measurement of image quality in diagnostic radiology. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 1999; 50(1):21–38.
Almen A, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Besjakov J, Kheddache S, Lanhede B, Mansson LG and Zankl M. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. The British Journal of Radiology, 2000; 73(875):1192–1199.
Brennan PC, McDonnell S and O'Leary D. Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for x-ray examinations. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, 2004; 108(3):263–268.
Compagnone G, Baleni MC, Pagan L, Calzolaio FL, Barozzi L and Bergamini C. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography. The British Journal of Radiology, 2006; 79(947):899–904.
Thompson, T.T. (1978). A practical approach to modern x-ray equipment. Boston, 233p.
Egbe, N.O., Olisemeke, B.F., Eduwem, D.U. Effect of delayed film processing and milliamperage changes on image combination. West African Journal of Radiology, 2005.
Sprawls, P. (1977). The Physical Principles of Diagnostic Radiology. London: University Park Press, 365p.
Egbe, N.O. (2004). Laboratory guide for Radiography students. Nigeria: University of Calabar Press, 77p.
Llyod, P.J. (2001). Quality Assurance workbook for Radiographers and Radiological Technologists. 175p.