MIMICKING THE CHEST RADIOGRAPH: PATIENT EQUIVALENCE OF THE CDRH CHEST PHANTOM WITH ADDED INSERT
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate medical X-ray doses and image quality, so called phantoms that mimic particular aspects of the patient are used. The Centre for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) chest phantom has been used for studies of radiation exposure to the lung fields under automatic exposure (AEC) conditions. Recently, a quasi-anatomical insert was introduced to create contrast between chest organs. Direct comparison of the phantom performance with clinical chest images has not been reported previously. This study applies the phantom to conventional radiography imaging of the chest to establish its patient equivalence.
Methods: Entrance doses with backscatter and chest radiographs of 77 patients were mirrored in the phantom at the same exposure factors. Optical density (OD) as well as beam transmission through the different regions of both media were also compared. A 2-sample t-test was used to test for differences while the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was used to test the strength of (any) linear relationship between the measured parameters in both media.
Results: Results show a 13.5% difference in entrance surface doses (ESD). Beam transmission through both media showed statistically significant differences (P = 0.05). ODlung was higher in CXR than the phantom images. OD (lung + ribs) on the CXR was not statistically different (P = 0.09) from the phantom ODlung. Mean OD for the mediastinum varied by 28%. Differences are statistically significant (P < 0.05) in all areas except the diaphragm (P = 0.8).
Conclusion: A linear relationship was found between measurements made with the phantom and CXR for beam transmission and for optical density. Thus the phantom can provide a useful test tool for both perceptual studies and quality assurance (QA) in chest radiography.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles in JRRS are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to Cite
References
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). ICRU Report 44. 1989.
Conway, B.J., Butler, P.F., Duff, J.E., Fewell, T.R., Gross, R.E., Jennings, R.J., et al. Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from automatic exposure-controlled chest examinations. Medical Physics, 1984; 11(6):827.
Dell, M.A. Phantoms for diagnostic radiology. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1993; 49(1–3):55–57.
Vassileva, J. A phantom for dose–image optimization in chest radiography. British Journal of Radiology, 2002; 75:837–842.
Beentjes, L.B., Timmermans, C.W.M. Patient doses in the Netherlands. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1991; 36:265–268.
van Kempen, R.J. Pattern of diagnostic procedures in radiology in the Netherlands. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1991; 36:257–259.
Yaffe, M.J., Johns, P.C., Nishikawa, R.M., Mawdsley, G.E., Caldwell, C.B. Anthropomorphic radiologic phantoms. Radiology, 1986; 158(2):550–552.
Gelijns, J., Schultze-Kool, L.J., Zoetelief, J., Zweers, D., Broerse, J.J. Image quality and dosimetric aspects of chest x-ray examinations: Measurements with various types of phantoms. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1993; 49(1–3):83–88.
Thirumala Rao, B.V., Raju, M.L.N., Narasimham, K.L., Parthasaradhi, K., Mallikarjuna Rao, B. Interaction of low-energy photons with biological materials and effective atomic number. Medical Physics, 1985; 12(6):745–748.
Tishenko, O., Hoeschen, C., Buhr, E. Reduction in anatomical noise in medical x-ray images. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2005; 114(1–3):66–74.